Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 56: e12650, 2023. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1420751

ABSTRACT

Liver injury occurs after ischemia and reperfusion (IR), as seen in transplant settings. Sex hormones have been implicated in many pathophysiological mechanisms in females and this could lead to liver protection under inflammatory reperfusion conditions where an excessive immune response occurs. Despite such assumptions, this fact needs to be further investigated. To address this, female and male C57BL/6J mice (8-12 weeks old) were studied. Bilateral ovariectomy (OVX) was performed in females to decrease estradiol levels. IR was performed, and after two weeks, all animals underwent a sham control operation or IR with euthanasia at the following time points after reperfusion: 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. IR triggered an inflammatory process in the liver with recruitment of neutrophils into the parenchyma of male mice. The female sham mice were protected against liver IR presenting no alteration of aminotransferase (ALT) levels compared to males. OVX caused loss of protection, increasing hepatic injury as represented by increased ALT levels and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity. Female sham mice showed increased Akt phosphorylation and activation, while males showed reduced Akt activation. Estradiol pretreatment recovered ALT levels after IR injury, which was associated with decreased liver injury.

2.
Arq. bras. med. vet. zootec. (Online) ; 72(6): 2365-2372, Nov.-Dec. 2020. tab
Article in English | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1142322

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of probiotics and synbiotics on the performance and Enterobacteriaceae count of broiler chickens. A total of 640 one-day-old male broiler chicks were distributed in a completely randomized design with four treatments and eight replicates with 20 birds each. The treatments were: ration with performance enhancer (zinc bacitracin; positive control); ration without performance enhancer and probiotic/synbiotic (negative control); ration with probiotics; and ration with synbiotics. At 35 days, five birds from each treatment were euthanized and intestinal contents were harvested for determining the Enterobacteriaceae count. The performance data and average colony-forming units (CFUs) transformed as log CFU/g were subjected to analysis of variance and Tukey's test. The effects of probiotics and synbiotics were observed in the initial phase, with supplemented birds exhibiting comparable weight gain to those supplemented with bacitracin. No effect of the treatment on broiler performance was observed after 42 days. The enterobacterial count was comparable among all experimental treatments. Supplementation with probiotics and synbiotics did not compromise the performance of broilers and did not alter the Enterobacteriaceae count.(AU)


Objetivou-se avaliar o efeito do probiótico e do simbiótico sobre o desempenho e a contagem de Enterobacteriaceae em frangos. Foram utilizados 640 pintos de corte, machos, de um dia de idade, distribuídos em delineamento inteiramente ao acaso, com quatro tratamentos, oito repetições com 20 aves cada. Os tratamentos foram: ração com melhorador de desempenho (bacitracina de zinco) (controle positivo); ração sem melhorador de desempenho e sem probiótico/simbiótico (controle negativo); ração com probiótico e ração com simbiótico. Aos 35 dias, cinco aves por tratamento foram eutanasiadas para retirada de conteúdo intestinal e determinação de Enterobacteriaceae. As médias das unidades formadoras de colônias, transformadas em log/UFC/g, e de desempenho foram submetidas à análise de variância e comparadas pelo teste Tukey. Foi observado efeito do probiótico e do simbiótico na fase inicial, sendo que aves apresentaram os mesmos resultados de ganho de peso e de peso corporal que o grupo de aves alimentado com bacitracina. Aos 42 dias, não houve efeito dos tratamentos sobre o desempenho. Aves que não receberam nenhum aditivo não apresentaram maior contagem de enterobactérias, sendo semelhantes aos demais tratamentos. A adição do probiótico e do simbiótico não compromete o desempenho dos frangos e não altera a contagem de Enterobacteriaceae.(AU)


Subject(s)
Animals , Bacitracin/administration & dosage , Chickens/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Enterobacteriaceae , Escherichia coli , Microbiota
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL